<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/MU" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Film's from a Natist Perspective</title>
	<link>http://nate.criticalblogs.com</link>
	<description>My Movie Reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:52:09 +0000</pubDate>	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Unendliche Geschichte, Die (1984) - Catchiest movie theme song ever - liked it</title>
		<link>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/12/14/catchiest-movie-theme-song-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/12/14/catchiest-movie-theme-song-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/12/14/catchiest-movie-theme-song-ever/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[	Apparently, this movie is in German, dubbed over in English. Which maybe explains why the theme song is only the title repeated over and over again. Yet even now it sings through my head.  When I watched the first hour of this with sixth graders the other day, I was surprised that I knew the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Apparently, this movie is in German, dubbed over in English. Which maybe explains why the theme song is only the title repeated over and over again. Yet even now it sings through my head.  When I watched the first hour of this with sixth graders the other day, I was surprised that I knew the song and that there was a giant dog dragon but had never seen the actual movie. </p>
	<p>Even though the story itself seems rather played out (nerdy bookworm makes good through imagination), I thought they did a pretty nice job with the story. It moves along well with a nice blend of tension, tragedy, sighs of relief and guffaws. And considering it was 1984, the effects are pretty good. They seemed to have a lot of fun with size.</p>
	<p> My favorite line, &#8220;Don&#8217;t worry, it&#8217;s a <em>racing</em> snail.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					<wfw:commentRss>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/12/14/catchiest-movie-theme-song-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Never Cry Wolf (1983) - Ewwww, he&#8217;s eating mice - liked it</title>
		<link>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/12/14/ewwww-hes-eating-mice/</link>
		<comments>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/12/14/ewwww-hes-eating-mice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/12/14/ewwww-hes-eating-mice/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[	This is the first of a series of reviews of movies I have only scene the first part of.  For two of them (this one and Neverending Story), I have not seen the second half because I watched them in class and only had one period.
	 I did like the first 50 min of Never Cry [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This is the first of a series of reviews of movies I have only scene the first part of.  For two of them (this one and Neverending Story), I have not seen the second half because I watched them in class and only had one period.</p>
	<p> I did like the first 50 min of Never Cry Wolf though. There are some really awesome shots of the Canadien North or Alaska. I am not sure where they filmed it. The story of the man studying the wolf is interesting, though sometimes it seems like things worked out a little too well. A big plus of watching this with sixth graders was watching them all squirm as he started eating mice. </p>
	<p>The imdb site said that some wolf expert is very skeptical as to the scientific accuracy of the wolf man&#8217;s findings. I feel like there are some interesting comparisons between this and grizzly man. Maybe Never Cry Wolf is Grizzly Man without a camera and not on crack. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					<wfw:commentRss>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/12/14/ewwww-hes-eating-mice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oklahoma (1979) - tap dancing cowboys - didn't like it</title>
		<link>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/11/29/tap-dancing-cowboys/</link>
		<comments>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/11/29/tap-dancing-cowboys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/11/29/tap-dancing-cowboys/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[	For some reason, I thought this movie was about the Oklahoma land grab. It turns out that it is just a wierd love story. The main thing that struck me about this movie was that almost nothing happens. In the first scene, they establish the flirtation between the two main characters and that there is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>For some reason, I thought this movie was about the Oklahoma land grab. It turns out that it is just a wierd love story. The main thing that struck me about this movie was that almost nothing happens. In the first scene, they establish the flirtation between the two main characters and that there is a sketchy guy who likes the girl. We also learn that there is some sort of hoe down that night and the girl is going with the sketchy guy. By intermission, they still have not left for the party!</p>
	<p> What happened then? Not a whole lot. They establish some other characters and a subplot involving a peddlar with some sort of foreign accent. The first act ends with a really bizarre, long ballet set. The dancers act out some sort of drug induced vision that the girl has after sniffing some egyptian salt she got from the peddlar. When I say long, I mean long, it was probably 7 minutes of dancing but felt like 15. How did they fit this into a Western?</p>
	<p>The second act is a little more satisfying story wise as the protagonists get together after some drama and stay together after a fiery climax. But there was really no story created tension in the whole thing. And the songs just weren&#8217;t that good. I mean the titular track is fun and all, but no where close to anything from West Side Story, The Music Man or Guys and Dolls. And the rest are even more pedestrian.</p>
	<p>I don&#8217;t know how this bodes for the Sonics, but I think there is an interesting comparison to be made with the movies about Seattle and Oklahoma. For Seattle I would choose Singles, because not only about Seattle, but has a big music component.  Singles, while not a great film tried to capture a certain moment in time and is certainly more watchable than Oklahoma. I would also say that the quality of the music is way better. But Oklahoma! has one very well known  song and a reputation as a great musical and the world acknowledges it as the superior movie. Oklahoma City has acquired a reputation as an NBA city because they sold out one season of basketball. I can  only hope that Seattle&#8217;s luck is better with the basketball than cinema.</p>
	<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					<wfw:commentRss>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/11/29/tap-dancing-cowboys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Night, and Good Luck. (2005) - As advertised - liked it</title>
		<link>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/11/06/as-advertised/</link>
		<comments>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/11/06/as-advertised/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 01:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/11/06/as-advertised/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[	I saw this a few nights ago and thought it was pretty enjoyable. It was nice to have a portrayal of the McCarthy stuff that played it a little cool. Usually, we get a story of someone brought before the commision and it gets a little melodramatic. Here we just see some stone cold news [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I saw this a few nights ago and thought it was pretty enjoyable. It was nice to have a portrayal of the McCarthy stuff that played it a little cool. Usually, we get a story of someone brought before the commision and it gets a little melodramatic. Here we just see some stone cold news men who do lots of drinking and smoking.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					<wfw:commentRss>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/11/06/as-advertised/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007) - Harry Potter - liked it</title>
		<link>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/07/24/harry-potter/</link>
		<comments>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/07/24/harry-potter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/07/24/harry-potter/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[	I feel like this summer is the last great hurrah of Harry Potter. Even if Rowling comes back with some more stories, I can&#8217;t imagine they will be good enough to match the NOWness of coming out with a movie and the final book within three weeks.  
	 I thought this movie was pretty good. Lots [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I feel like this summer is the last great hurrah of Harry Potter. Even if Rowling comes back with some more stories, I can&#8217;t imagine they will be good enough to match the NOWness of coming out with a movie and the final book within three weeks.  </p>
	<p> I thought this movie was pretty good. Lots of angst, but they did a nice job of making Umbridge very distasteful, Luna a little odd and made some of the wizarding very spectacular. There was a lot left out, but nothing that really detracted from the story. I appreciate that he kept it under two hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					<wfw:commentRss>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/07/24/harry-potter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transformers (2007) - You dissappoint me once again, Starscream - liked it</title>
		<link>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/07/24/you-dissappoint-me-once-again-starscream/</link>
		<comments>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/07/24/you-dissappoint-me-once-again-starscream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/07/24/you-dissappoint-me-once-again-starscream/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[	This is a flawed movie. The plot is absurd and they spend way too much time in big rooms with generals. I thought they spent way too much time on the hacker/virus plotline, but the part where the DDR cousin crashes through the sliding glass door was one of the favorite part of one of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This is a flawed movie. The plot is absurd and they spend way too much time in big rooms with generals. I thought they spent way too much time on the hacker/virus plotline, but the part where the DDR cousin crashes through the sliding glass door was one of the favorite part of one of my students so I guess someone liked it. But while I was not excited enough after watching it to run home from the theater, I do keep looking out for the autobot cars and wondering what it would look like if they transformed. That, ultimately, is why I not only liked this movie, but why I would watch it again. The awesomness of the robots overwhelmed the other lame parts of the story. I just wished they spent more time with the robots interacting with eachother.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					<wfw:commentRss>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/07/24/you-dissappoint-me-once-again-starscream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spider-Man 3 (2007) - villian overload - C+</title>
		<link>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/06/05/villian-overload/</link>
		<comments>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/06/05/villian-overload/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/06/05/villian-overload/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[	my initial thought at seeing teh previews for spiderman 3 was, &#8220;holy crap, there is going to be a lot of stuff happening here.&#8221; later i saw some other previews and heard some positive hype and thought &#8220;well, maybe rami can pull it off.&#8221; after watching the movie, it seems like the film tended more [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>my initial thought at seeing teh previews for spiderman 3 was, &#8220;holy crap, there is going to be a lot of stuff happening here.&#8221; later i saw some other previews and heard some positive hype and thought &#8220;well, maybe rami can pull it off.&#8221; after watching the movie, it seems like the film tended more towards the former expectation. i really liked spiderman 2 because it did such a nice job of capturing peter parker&#8217;s problems and put them into a nice rhythm with a supervillian plot. he created solid continuity between the happy parker montage and an awesome doc ock fight scene on a subway. </p>
	<p> This movie seemed to attempt some of that same blending, but it felt a bit forced. There were some great CGI fight scenes but the bad peter parker theme was just not compelling for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					<wfw:commentRss>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/06/05/villian-overload/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minority Report (2002) - Everybody runs. - liked it</title>
		<link>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/05/14/everybody-runs/</link>
		<comments>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/05/14/everybody-runs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 16:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/05/14/everybody-runs/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[	I saw part of this in a class the other days and it brought back a few thoughts I have on the movie. Primarily I remember being surprisingly entertained when I saw it in the theater. It is simply a nicely paced action movie with some interesting plot twists and Spielburg executes it very well. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I saw part of this in a class the other days and it brought back a few thoughts I have on the movie. Primarily I remember being surprisingly entertained when I saw it in the theater. It is simply a nicely paced action movie with some interesting plot twists and Spielburg executes it very well. I also really like the computer technology that seems to be the computer technology that seems to be an extreme nintendo power glove combined with a projected screen, some fancy video technology and windows 3000.</p>
	<p>But in other movies Spielburg is just not as good. I tihnk the things that make minority report good are that he spends less time showing us the humanity of the characters and more time having Tom Cruises eyeballs taken out. Now that&#8217;s a movie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					<wfw:commentRss>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/05/14/everybody-runs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patton (1970) - I know I&#8217;m a prima donna. - liked it</title>
		<link>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/05/10/i-know-im-a-prima-donna/</link>
		<comments>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/05/10/i-know-im-a-prima-donna/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 17:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/05/10/i-know-im-a-prima-donna/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[	I thought this wa pretty interesting and well done. Patton was definitely an interesting character. I thought the scenes showing the germans being afraid of him were a bit heavy as was his hate of the russians. it seemed to voice a lot of cold war frustrations - why don&#8217;t the politicians let us end [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I thought this wa pretty interesting and well done. Patton was definitely an interesting character. I thought the scenes showing the germans being afraid of him were a bit heavy as was his hate of the russians. it seemed to voice a lot of cold war frustrations - why don&#8217;t the politicians let us end what we start, etc. pretty astute acting all around. the gender angle was also interesting as the only women we see are a british women&#8217;s group he speaks to and some burly russians at the end.</p>
	<p>also interesting was a teacher&#8217;s decision to show this to an ESL history class. they had absolutley no clue what was going on. i have never seen so many heads hit so many desks so fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					<wfw:commentRss>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/05/10/i-know-im-a-prima-donna/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Osmosis Jones (2001) - You want Osmosis? - liked it</title>
		<link>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/03/28/you-want-osmosis/</link>
		<comments>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/03/28/you-want-osmosis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/03/28/you-want-osmosis/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[	I watched this while subbing for an 8th grade science class recently and was pleasantly surprised. Interwoven into a straightforward cop story/single dad story are a lot of pretty funny riffs on the human body. There are some real scenes of an unhealthy Bill Murray and some rapid fire Chris Rock jokes about the dirty [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I watched this while subbing for an 8th grade science class recently and was pleasantly surprised. Interwoven into a straightforward cop story/single dad story are a lot of pretty funny riffs on the human body. There are some real scenes of an unhealthy Bill Murray and some rapid fire Chris Rock jokes about the dirty side of the workings of the body. All in all, not bad for a movie with the potential to be awful.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					<wfw:commentRss>http://nate.criticalblogs.com/2007/03/28/you-want-osmosis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>